After 2010, Politics and elections gave a big
turn. From this year corporations were allowed to support their political
candidate or party without limit in their funds. This of course has caused a
big deal between citizens. Some of them argue that this will increase people’s
expectations and ideas about their candidates and they will know all the truth
about them. However, some others say that this is no democracy because when
money can be used limitless even the votes can be bought.
It is not a surprise that for the conservative
view this new law will be an advantage. Corporations will always support the
candidate who cuts taxes so they can save millions of dollars and make more
profits. For conservatives free speech has to be spread all around the country
and for them corporations are not the exception.
On the other hand, liberals claim that when
money is involved the results can be manipulated. This investment will also be
a dangerous one. Corporations will invest for the candidates that are going to favor
them. These shadowed campaigns will try to convince the poor or less educated
people.
I think allowing corporations to use their
money without a limit in the political campaigns has advantages and
disadvantages. As citizens, we want to know what is going on with the
candidates and with money we can find out even their more hidden secrets. On
the other hand, I do not believe in the fact that this 2012 are going to be
clean and totally uncorrupted.
Johanna,
ReplyDeleteGood post, but I have some suggestions.
Try to infuse lots of facts into each paragraph. Use statistics, names, events, dates, and quotes from experts.
Your paragraphs need more information. Also, your opposing viewpoint paragraph is too short. Which conservatives support Citizens United? How much money is being raised?
Your writing is good, but I would like to see more specific information/content.
Also, where are the pictures? Don't forget to put at least 2.
GR: 84